Semi-Annual Exercise

Investor geeks, dig in. Anyone that wants an insight into how I think, join them. It’s the last day of the year and time for my semi-annual exercise. Don’t worry. This exercise isn’t very sweaty.

Twice a year I review all of my stocks to ask myself why I own them and what I should do with them. It’s an idea I got from Peter Lynch. An investor (as contrasted with a trader) should be able to concisely describe the companies behind their stocks. I consider myself an investor, though some call me a speculator. You can judge for yourself whether I am concise. I suspect I use more words than he suggests. I also don’t quite adhere to one of his other quotes,

“If you spend more than 14 minutes a year worrying about the market, you’ve wasted 12 minutes.”

I think the market is more entertaining than almost every sport and sitcom so why would I ignore it? Besides, even if I spend a few hours every six months compiling these synopses and casually watching my stocks during the day, I’m glad to say I spend even more time exercising other bits of my life like running, dancing, skiing, kayaking, and socializing.

These synopses are most valuable if they become part of a discussion. That’s why I post them on various discussion boards on The Motley Fool, Investor Village, and Silicon Investor. If you want to comment, great. Register for whichever site suits you. The best sites let you read for free. Every year I gain an insight because someone challenged an assertion, pointed out an omission, or revealed something I’d overlooked. One year someone pointed out a typo. I’d written that I won a stock. They wanted to know what lottery I was playing. (I owned it not won it.)

Motley Fool
American Superconductor AMSC
Dendreon         DNDN
Gaiam            GAIA
Geron            GERN
Microvision        MVIS
Real Goods Solar    RSOL
Economy and Markets

Investor Village
American Superconductor AMSC
Dendreon         DNDN
Gaiam            GAIA
Geron            GERN
GigOptix        GGOX
Microvision        MVIS
Real Goods Solar    RSOL

Silicon Investor
American Superconductor AMSC
Dendreon         DNDN
Gaiam            GAIA
Geron            GERN
GigOptix        GGOX
Microvision        MVIS

Most of these semi-annual exercises go back for years, so you and I can check my view of their progress.

One thing I learned in this year’s exercise is that my portfolio of speculative companies from a few years ago is maturing into a portfolio of profitable companies. All of them except Geron are generating product revenues. American Superconductor, Gaiam, and Real Good Solar are profitable. Dendreon, GigOptix, and Microvision have good chances of profitability by the end of 2012. When their stock prices reflect that it will be easier to buy a new muffler for my Jeep. Maybe within two years my portfolio will make it esay to replace the muffler, donate the Jeep, buy a new electric SUV, and set off on an extended hiking, kayaking, bicycling, dancing, skiing road trip vacation while the contractors renovate my house and someone manages everything I’ve temporarily left behind. It could happen. Hey, if Microvision becomes a success many things will change for the better.

Stay tuned.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

TV Less

On Monday I gave myself a Christmas present. I turned off my TV. More specifically, I canceled my DirecTV service, a satellite that will continue to beam a signal at my house, but that I will ignore and not pay for anymore. My monitor continues to live, but now it exists to stream internet content, some of which I generate. Except for that last part, this takes me back to how I started my adult life, TV-less.

Many people can proudly state that they survive without television, and have done so for years. I’m not a hard one to convince. That’s the way I started my adult life.

When I went to college I didn’t have one in the room. They may not have been allowed. Virginia Tech was a very strict school then. When I moved off campus my roommates had one, but it didn’t matter much because I was busy studying and barely surviving as an aerospace engineering student. When I graduated and headed west to my job at Boeing in Seattle I didn’t buy one because for awhile I was too concerned with paying for things like food and rent. I actually took a pay cut from my summer job in the steel mill to become an engineer. That says something about both places, but that’s another post.

Living without a TV is quiet and a wonderful incentive to read or get out of the house. It is not the life for a single, lazy, illiterate hermit.

I lived without one because I was addicted to it as a teenager. When there were only three or four networks it was possible to memorize the weekly schedule for optimal viewing. It was a geeky thing to do. I didn’t want to fall back into that habit. My parents weren’t so sure that it was a good idea to disconnect. So, they bought me a television for Christmas. I thanked them for the computer monitor, because that was all I expected to use it for. Kids never do the expected. I hooked it up to my Texas Instrument computer (remember those?), programmed in Basic, and stored the data on cassette tapes. But I hit the slippery slope and slid back into watching the networks, and then cable, and then satellite feeds for the next 28 years. My entertainment went from free to expensive so slowly that it was hard to notice.

I’d heard about streaming, and did some via my computer, but my computer is old and some of the content buffered excessively. Finally I saw that the price of the simplest streaming boxes were about the same that I was paying for one month of satellite service. I watched the way I watched. And I found myself turning on the TV, scrolling through untold channels, probably settling on some rerun of a documentary, and then hitting MUTE or OFF when an noxious commercial came on. What was I paying for?

Television does have a place, but programming decisions made it less useful in my life. Originally I justified watching to keep aware of trends, the news, and the stock market. Trends are reflected on shows, but I can see many trends by walking through shops and going to dances. The news has switched from factual reporting to emotional commentary. Even CNBC, “First in Business Worldwide”, alienated me with some of their myopic and self-centered coverage during the financial crisis. Besides, getting information from their scrolling stock ticker is chaotic and random, while Yahoo Finance and Google Finance can provide me with better information in the time it takes to wait through one commercial.

Industries, technologies, trends, many aspects of our culture arise from a need, develop based on their environment, and come to believe themselves indispensable, but time can allow accumulated anachronisms and bureaucratic complexities. Simple actions and ideas can unseat them. Within physics, epicycles fell to Newton’s Law of Gravity. The Reformation fractured Catholicism because Martin Luther posted a note to a church door. Television is being challenged by the Internet. Steve Jobs frequently redefines experiences and industries. Imagine other ideas that are complex and anachronistic awaiting simple challengers: Microsoft Windows, the US Tax Code, anything in your life that inspires the response, “There’s got to be a simpler way”. Why do we (though not me anymore) commute for miles and hours in single occupancy vehicles?

Every change brings a need for education. Streaming video is better, but I miss some things (come on Alton Brown, get on hulu or Netflix) and I’m involved in a treasure hunt for some of the shows I know exist somewhere in that box (I bought a roku). But change is good. Education is good. And not having to watch alarmist ads for medical conditions is marvelous.

Getting rid of my TV service may not be as dramatic a change as accepting Newton’s laws, but it feels good to replace archaic complexity with modern simplicity.

(note: There’s a development within the world of Simple Living. The discussion forums from the Simple Living Network have a new home www.simplelivingforum.net courtesy of The New Road Map Foundation. More about this later.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Little Gifts

Merry Christmas! And yes I do celebrate it despite my ambiguous religious philosophy. The world needs more celebrations, so I’m grabbing them as they go by. When’s Buddha’s birthday? As I’ve aged, matured, gotten older, the pile of presents around the tree has shrunk, and yet, the holiday and its gifts mean more to me.

Back in the bad old Dark Ages they had something right. Just about every other day was a holiday. (Wish I could find the attribution for that, but it was from a PBS show about twenty years ago.) They worked from dawn to dusk, unless they had the entire day off for a saint’s day or to commemorate some event. They worked harder than people today, but they also had more time off. They had time, but they didn’t have money. Their gifts were small, handmade, and they didn’t come in stacks.

I remember piles of presents back in my childhood. Sorting through to find the From:s and To:s and then distributing boxes around the room to everyone’s selected seat for the morning. Eventually the ripped wrapping paper would be piled high enough to bury a few unopened presents and a mining expedition would be launched to locate the lost toys or overlooked socks. I think I still have unopened boxes of handkerchiefs.

Every year the task got harder. People get older, and but their own things. What does anyone get any well-paid person? Today’s working American has probably already bought more luxury items in a year than a peasant owned in their life, and for the peasant, a dozen tube socks would be a major prize.

One year, for the fun of it, I gave my Dad a Nerf ball. My mom didn’t understand why a man in his twenties would buy his dad a spongy ball. At which point he and I started throwing at each other, and started laughing.

It was the simple thing, the small gift that appealed the most.

I’m over fifty. Family is scattered, and I celebrate my own traditions, including at Christmas. I mimic a bit of my mom’s cooking by baking a ham and cooking up a few other side dishes. The lights are up, though only a few strands because my house and yard are small. That’s all I need and want. The tree is only a five footer. I picked a small one because it is still alive and will be replanted as a donation in a deforested area. Live trees are heavy. My back agrees that small is good. The presents around the tree make the smallest collection ever, but I know that the ones I’ve added for myself are just what I want. I don’t know about the others yet. They’re still wrapped.

Getting to know myself has helped me realize that, for me, some $200 sweater isn’t as appreciated as a good $20 walking stick. Socks really are good gifts, especially those expensive hiking ones that are big enough for my size 14 feet. I also realize that things that are just trinkets can accumulate. There’s a limit to how many Nerf balls a small house can hold. But food, really good food, may not last long, but it will be savored. One treat I give myself is to run around to the local winery, and the local seafood/smokehouse and stock up on fine victuals. Smoked salmon. Yum.

Heart-warming gifts are the things that can’t be wrapped. Friends dropping by. Great conversations. A walk after every meal, and maybe singing carols as if no one could hear.

We’ve been through some tough times. Despite its Christian basis, I think this particular Christmas is a celebration and a sigh of relief for many non-Christians  too who didn’t think they’d get through the economic slump. Many are still waiting for the good days, and I hope they find them. That’s the handy thing about society and community, the ones that reach solid ground can help the others.

The ads for cars and wall-sized TVs may help the sales of really big ribbons, but I suspect that the small gifts, a smile, a donation, an open door, a hug, are bigger and better than all the rest.

Merry Christmas.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

From the Middle

I am a moderate, which in today’s land pundits and opinions is looked upon as boring, non-committal, uncertain, and inconsequential. I like the middle. The middle is where balance is achieved and is the fulcrum for motion.

I’ve been called a “wild-assed” investor, probably because I invest in stocks instead of bonds, and favor small companies, at least at the start. I’ve also been labeled as a a boring investor because I hold stocks for years. That’s not very aggressive and misses out on lots of opportunities as stocks pop and drop. (Of course, that book is the basis for this blog.)

I call myself a chicken adventurer. Many people call me an adventurer because of a few things I’ve done, bicycled across America, walked across Scotland, climbed Mt. Rainier, written a series of books based on hiking throughout the year in various wild places. Yet I know that I am a chicken. I rode along the interstate and tried to finish each bicycling day before afternoon traffic, only walked along Scotland’s buses and rail lines, climbed with a guide service, and stepped back from back weather and avalanche chutes.

Being in the middle, being moderate or intermediate, has its advantages. I’ve lived some fascinating episodes without taking on too much risk. I’ve retired early though to a frugal lifestyle. I’ve been able to accomplish many things, not because I am more talented than most, but because I am willing to venture forth knowing that I’ll make a few mistakes.

I love to dance. Opinions differ there too. I’ve been asked to teach, so someone must think I have a skill, but professional dancers know I work more from exuberance and creativity than from consummate technique. But I keep in mind that, by my own criteria, I am good enough and could get better. I measure my dancing by how much I enjoy it. That’s not a technical assessment, but it is a fundamental and primal one. When I go to a dance, I only sit out a few songs, sometimes because I don’t know what to do with it, but usually because I need a break. As entertainment, my dancing is more than good enough for me.

There are very few things at which I am trying to excel: listening, communicating, living a healthy life, being a better person, etc. By accepting imperfections, it becomes easier to accomplish more. That extra time required for perfection can be used to indulge in some other task, or spend time having more fun.

I’m satisfied with a portfolio that does better than most, even if it doesn’t maximize potential. I enjoy the intermediate ski runs, with occasional trips to the greens and blacks for variety. I don’t know every dance style or step, but dancing makes me smile, so something must be working.

I keep this in mind at this time of year. The holidays can be stressful where they should be joyful. Finding the exact gift is stressful. Giving a gift with good intent is more joyful. The recipient may be a bit confused when they unwrap their present, but perfectly predicting everyone else’s behaviour is impossible. It is the thought that counts, at least when it comes to presents.

The mainstream media may focus on extremists and alarmists, but I’m glad to hang out here, in the middle, where we can rock it back and forth, have a bit of fun, and also have a place to rest and relax. I hope you enjoy the holidays and I ask the writers amongst you to pardon my overuse of the word “I”. I just didn’t feel like wordsmithing the post that much. It’s sunny outside and I want to soak up some photons. Gotta keep it all in balance, eh?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Busy People

A literary manager who needs to be a bit more selfish and find time for her own writing too, a serial novelist who is great at picking titles and knows her genre, (Hanna Rhys Barnes, author of The Scorpion Moon Trilogy), and someone who understands that even cancer should be laughed at, (Cancer is a Funny Thing by Marie de Haan). I met them all and a dozen others this week. Sleepy islands tend to be inhabited by very busy creative people. The island just seems sleepy because it’s quiet. It’s quiet because everyone is working on something. I’m sure that we’re not the only ones, and we don’t always do it alone.

I love to talk. Public speaking isn’t hard for me, except for the first three minutes. That’s why I have more of a problem standing up for “Just give us a quick few sentences Tom” than I do for “We’d love to hear you give your slideshow. Will an hour be enough?” For many people, talking to an audience for an hour would be a torture that begins days before the event. I’ve taught kids karate classes. No group of adults has been more intimidating that three dozen twelve year olds who are looking forward to punching and kicking. Good thing there were mirrors in that room so I could see behind me.

Andrea Hurst is a writer and literary manager, who doesn’t let the word “agent” appear anywhere on her business card, who also hosts a writer’s group in Coupeville. She does a lot more, but I was introduced to her and her group by accepting an invitation to talk to them for about twenty minutes or so. Of course I said yes. Besides, they meet over my current photo essay. They get together at a coffee shop (Local Grown) at the end of a wharf that sits over the waters of Penn Cove. Nice place to sit.

In a time when many feel malaise from economic and environmental concerns, she gathered fifteen people so they could support and encourage each other. Some support groups are group hugs with kind words. These folks do that, and also bring their notepads, computers, advice, and reports of progress. Maybe the shop’s caffeine powers them along, but I suspect they would be busy no matter where they met. And I suspect that because they meet, they are busier than they would be alone.

Humans are social creatures. Our current society emphasizes the individual, which I applaud, but it can be taken too far. Independence is powerful. A lot can get done when it isn’t necessary to negotiate. A singular vision, pursued without distraction, can be manifested more quickly than by any committee. But much of what needs to be accomplished benefits from collaboration.

I donate my time and effort to two organizations: Whidbey Camano Land Trust and The New Road Map Foundation. I do more than that, but those are the only two official positions. For the Land Trust I am a site steward, which means I help tend one of the properties. I use it as an excuse to kill invasive plants like blackberries. They seem to appreciate it. Besides, what else is there to do? It isn’t like anyone is going to steal the land. For New Road Map, I am on the board and the Secretary, so I lend a hand by typing furiously during our meetings and speaking up on occasion. Evidently, everyone else that doesn’t want to take notes is very appreciative of the fact that I will do it for them.

Writers can write alone. I finished five books that way, but even then I had a little help here and there. I appreciated the folks who checked my manuscripts: brave souls willing to wade through typos and bad punctuation. But I couldn’t take on the Land Trust’s job on my own, not even if I had millions. I couldn’t take on New Road Map’s financial literacy campaign as effectively as an organization can. They’ve pulled together a wiki, lists of speakers, online study guides, and are reaching out to forums and larger community. A group of writers accomplishes more together, even though most projects only need one writer.

We’ve got problems, global, economic, and environmental; and while the pundits and the politicians posture, the rest of us, or at least many of us, are working at making things better. Individual efforts count. So do the collaborative ones. We’re coming up on Christmas and I think we, the great unheralded us, are giving ourselves the greatest gifts to ourselves, each other, and the planet. It may seem like nothing is going on, like everyone else is asleep, but I think it’s quiet because so many people are as busy as Santa’s elves.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Unpopular Innovations

Want to drive a lot of traffic to a blog? Get angry. Vent against the injustices of the world. Lambast the causes of the issues that are being overlooked or marginalized. The media and the politicians are caught up in ideological combat taken to such an extreme that the results of their debates are trivial. A senator was censured for concealing hundreds of thousands of dollars of personal finances. The Senate spent precious months of their time getting around to slapping his wrist. I imagine their time was worth millions, and I suspect that the more important issues affected billions. We have bigger issues for our elected officials to deal with, and people better equipped to prosecute criminal actions. See, it’s easy to find something to get angry about. I spend more of my time watching the problem solvers of the world. For some reason, the media considers them to be less worthy of news time. For some reason they are unpopular.

Here’s a list of gifts given to the world, in no particular order though I’ll start with the companies I am most familiar with, some of those from my portfolio.

Electric cables that do for electrical power what fiber optics did for electrical signals – American Superconductor (AMSC) is building and shipping superconducting cables that incredibly efficiently flow electricity at 100 times the power density of old cables. That’s very handy for replacing old and overworked copper cables that run under our cities. Fewer losses means less power has to be generated. The cables are also self-limiting. If a cable gets too hot, it shuts down itself instead of the whole grid.

Cancer vaccines that train the body to fight its cancers – Dendreon (DNDN) is the first company to receive FDA approval for a cancer immunotherapy. Their prostate cancer vaccine, Provenge, is a treatment, not a drug, that retrains the body’s immune system to recognize the cancer’s markers. It isn’t a panacea, but it is as effective and frequently better than chemo and radiation, but without their side effects. It looks like it might work on other cancers too.

Stem cells to regrow damaged body parts, including nerves – Geron (GERN) is already testing a stem cell treatment to help paralyzed people regain motor control, or as I hope, walk again. Simple enough to say, hard to work within the science, harder to work within today’s ideological climate. And they are making progress despite the hurdles.

Wall-sized displays that fit in your pocket – Microvision (MVIS) is building and selling a projector (ShowWX) the size of an iPhone that makes a display as large as you like, well as large as you con see considering the surrounding lighting and its current 10-15 lumens. I use it to watch movies after sunset. But the projector isn’t the size of an iPhone. The real unit is much smaller. Most of the volume is battery and electronics, so any electronic device that can use a display that already has power and a circuit board is a candidate for using Microvision’s components. That’s not a big deal until you consider the materials and transportation involved in every laptop, monitor, and television display.

The most interesting things are happening outside my portfolio.

The Space Race is begun anew – SpaceX just celebrated the first private orbital launch and recovery. Finally we can get back into space without worrying about the government. The military-industrial complex has competition, and I suspect that the private companies will win. Lots of the Space Age dreams from the sixties weren’t fantasies, but they weren’t going to succeed when they had to be funneled through NASA and the Air Force. Any agency that relied on Congress for funding while also fearing Congressional review wasn’t going to be able to truly innovate in ways that more directly benefited private citizens.

Lasers against malaria – Intellectual Ventures, a firm founded by Nathan Myrhvold, loves to invent stuff. Now, that’s a place I’d love to work at. They’ve invented a laser that can track, identify and kill malarial mosquitoes while avoiding the rest of the insect world. It may sound bizarre, but they bought the components on eBay. Now they are trying to make it economical enough to deploy where it really matters.

Electric cars that aren’t dull – Tesla (TSLA), okay this one is a cheat because maybe you have heard of them, but come on, an electric car that is actually desirable. The age of making fun of electric cars with really long extension cords is over. Tesla’s cars take advantage of electricity to be powerful and simple. They are an elegant and fun solution rather than an exercise in grudging acceptance of scarcity.

Repurposing, or as I think of it mining our second hand mountains – There isn’t only one person to mention, but I’ll pass along one example. Dan Phillips built a house, then he built houses, and he did it with stuff that people had thrown aside. Many people have very little money, or see no reason to spend what they have; but, they are making houses, windmills, lives out of stuff that normally ends up in the landfill. Their ideas and attitude can pervade the planet and have a greater impact than any corporation, but they only make the news as human interest stories. They embody my greatest hope for our future. That’s real human interest.

This is a season of hope, and I find it fascinating that it happens amidst winter (at least for half the planet). To me, innovations are gifts, tiny unexpected packages that lighten my world. The media may not find innovations as popular as ethics panel debates, but innovations and innovators are popular with me.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Merika

Obvious to some, but not to all, ‘Merika is what many islanders call the mainland. ‘Merika is that different world, that place that works from a foreign set of rules, mores, and attitudes from what’s normal on the island. I’m more specific about it. I think ‘Merika is that urban part of America that thrives on crowds, consumption, and turmoil. Since I’ve moved to the island, I see the difference and I visit ‘Merika less. But, I am also a traveler; so, with more trepidation than I had visiting Scotland, this week I ventured into the warrens of urbania.

Traveling can be done for two reasons: to get away from where you are, or to go see something different. My trips up to Barclay Lake showed me the distinction. Some hikers are in the mountains to be in the mountains. Some are in the mountains to not be at home. Both are valid, but each has its own objective. Sometimes a trip has a bit of both. Scotland was like that for me. So is my yearly ski trip to Silver Star. My trips to Seattle are to visit a culture.

Want to see other cultures and try to understand another aspect of humanity? Traveling to India can do that, but for those of us in the US, there are a lot of cultures to choose from within our borders. Witnessing poverty can make a person appreciate their various types of wealth. Doing that in the third world can even be noble. But is it any less noble to see it in West Virginia or Alabama? Witnessing opulence and extravagance in Monaco is generally more appealing, but we can make fun of it within our borders. Try the Hamptons or Palm Springs. To me jokes are the distinctive sign of another culture. When we make fun of our neighbors we are also recognizing that they are a different culture. I think that makes them worth a visit.

My bicycle ride across the United States spawned a book (Just Keep Pedaling, and now photos too) that I called a cultural essay. Most folks don’t notice the choice of genre, but to me the ride was as much a journey through cultures as it was a bicycle ride. Aspen is not like Arkansas. Salt Lake City is not like Florida. There are plenty of jokes about rich snobs, hillbillies, fundamentalists, and retirees and that’s partly because their lives are distinctive. I enjoyed observing the distinctions.

Now that I live on the island, I like to make fun of ‘Merika too. Of course, I lived there for decades, which is true of most islanders. We are good at the jokes because we are laughing at our former selves.

It is too easy to become cloistered within a culture too, so occasionally I venture across the moat via the ferry and wander through bits of my earlier neighborhoods. Doctor and dentist visits are my usual impetus, but especially around the holidays I will purposely wander through the shops and malls to see if mainstream America has changed. There are always new trends and fads. As an investor I watch the shopping bags and the parking lots to see which businesses are doing well. (Back before I moved to the island such a trip to the mall helped convince me that Starbucks was still a good buy, though that was years ago. No such investing tips this time except to see that the crowds are returning.) As a traveler I watch peoples’ attitudes and styles. Are they dressed up or down? Conforming or rebelling? Or making sure they are rebelling the same way everyone else is?

Exiting the cloister is one reason I’d like to see organizations hold seminars in unusual surroundings. Frugality evangelists meeting in Las Vegas, environmentalists at a truck stop, political conventions in a a hurricane ravaged and flooded city. Dramatic juxtapositions can force insights and break habitual thought patterns. Tree huggers meeting in a forest will have a good time, but tree huggers meeting amidst truckers can bring a reality to the difficulty of their communicating their point of view. Pity that it might require additional security. Who would chaperon tree huggers and truckers? Hmm, my back brain is already playing with that one. Ninjas?

This week I went to the dentist. My teeth look good. Yea! After that I wandered the strip malls and a discount mega-store. There were enough shoppers to keep the clerks busy, but without long lines. The parking lots were busy, but I didn’t have trouble finding a spot. People are buying gifts, which is good for the businesses and their employees, but I was saddened to see that much of the merchandise were trinkets. The grandest displays were for items that would be used once, and maybe couldn’t be used a second time. Their three defining features seemed to be that they were from China, in easy-to-wrap boxes, and that they’d elicit some comment when they were unwrapped. Our recent journey through economic upheaval does not seem to have changed the shopping habits of ‘Merika.

The distinction about ‘Merika’s shopping habits were heightened because the next day I walked though some of the stores on the island. The stores are smaller and can’t waste shelf space. Much of what is for sale is either useful or attractive or both. The closest any item was to being useless was art, and that’s just because the usefulness of beauty is hard to describe. Unfortunately, the stores were emptier. I was glad for the prime parking spot, but would have celebrated having to walk a block or two if there were larger crowds. (Coincidentally, while I was walking through the other galleries, one of my framed pieces was sold to someone from Seattle, so I know that I’m not the only traveler.)

I might make the trip again. Visiting a full size mall on a Saturday before Christmas is a lot like visiting Vegas, lots of people, lights, noise, and money flowing around. It is a startling ceremony that I find more entertaining than the running of the bulls in Spain. I’ll smile and wade through, letting the crowds carry me along. And I’ll laugh at myself because, once upon a time, this was my life too. Back then I didn’t dream of a life lived any other way. Now, I’m glad I took the time back then to travel and visit another culture – even one that was so close to home and so far away. Now, I couldn’t imagine living anywhere else. (Hey, wait a minute, hadn’t I said something similar before? Hmm . . .)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Cents and Percents

Thank you MVIS and DNDN for serendipitously setting a fine example for today’s post. As I type, they are both up about 20 cents. That’s a yawn and a whoopdie-do, both and neither. MVIS is up $0.20 from about $1.70. DNDN is up from about $37.40. So, 20 cents means about a 12% rise for MVIS and a 0.5% rise for DNDN. Which is more important? Neither, but investors’ emotional reactions to simple arithmetic can take over leaving logic behind. One thing is for sure. Positive is positive. Up is good.

Daily stock price fluctuations can be mesmerizing and engrossing. Traders need to watch them, surfing the rises and dips, sometimes profitably, sometimes not. Investors don’t have to watch prices bounce, though I confess that I do. Two things I do before breakfast are check for messages (email and Facebook) and check my stocks. I rarely expect to do anything with my portfolio, but I am fascinated by the spectator sport that is investing. I remember though that I spend less time at stocks than baseball fans spend checking their stats.

My investment style is based on investing in small companies that I expect will become large companies. I try to buy their stocks when they are cheap, which is usually because they are overlooked or too small to gain the attention of a Wall Street researcher. (see my book for details) When I check the morning stock prices, I am checking to see if something happened that will bring the company to the attention of the large financial houses. If there’s a pop or drop I look for a news item. If there’s no news, it might be stock manipulation, someone rebalancing their portfolio, or a mistake. Many people have bought SYY (Sysco) thinking they were buying CSCO (Cisco). If there is news, I check to see if it is fluff or substantial. I only think it is substantial if it specifies timelines, or finances, or legal commitments.

Toady’s move in MVIS seems to be tied to an announcement with Pioneer, the electronics firm. The two companies have a Memorandum of Understanding to develop HUDs, Head Up Displays, i.e. dashboards displayed on your windshield that will go for sale in 2012. MVIS is up 20%. I won’t turn it down, but I won’t pop the champagne either. A Memorandum of Understanding can sound significant, but it is more like getting engaged than getting married. A breakup can happen overnight without involving nearly as many legal entanglements. It will be good news if it really happens.

That’s the tricky part with little companies. Their early moves are large percentages but small price moves. Making 20% in an average year beats the average market. Making 20% in a day is even better, and can frequently be the beginning of many such days as an overlooked company and stock gets closer to its truer value.

Stocks don’t go straight up forever. It is an investing cliche and correct. As the stock becomes more valuable, the percentage rises tend to drop. A 20% rise adds about $20,000,000 to Microvision’s value. They have about 100,000,000 shares, so a rise of $0.20 per share or a 20% rise increases the market’s guess of the companies value by twenty million dollars. Dendreon was that small at one time. It is now worth about $5,400,000,000 and still only has about 100,000,000 shares. It’s $.20 rise increases it’s value by $20,000,000 too, but the percentage is much smaller, only about 0.5%. There’s no real news tied to DNDN’s move. It bounces around about that much every day.

Microvision’s news may not be stellar, but it is good. I am glad to see it. Dendreon’s news is non-existent, but I am glad to see DNDN’s move too. Twenty cents per share of any stock in my portfolio has a real impact regardless of the percentages involved. For every share I own, my portfolio’s value increases by twenty cents. That’s becomes a lot when multiplied by thousands of shares.

There’s a transition in long term investing in initially small companies. The daily percentage movements shrink as the company becomes worth more, but the total value of a pop due to real news tends to become much higher. At the start of DNDN’s rise (see my post from back then) there was a week when it was up ~185%. That was almost a $10 rise. Microvision probably won’t see that sort of dollar movement anytime soon, unless they sign a very publicly lucrative deal with Apple, but they could easily eclipse that percentage movement purely because their stock is so cheap and the company is so heavily discounted quantitatively and qualitatively. I’ll cheer any such movement, because the percentages make good stories, but it is the dollar value that actually affects my life.

Imagine that an investor makes $10,000 in a year because a stock goes up 100%. If the next year it “only” goes up 50% , the investor makes $10,000. The next year, 33%, $10,000. As the years go by and the stock only goes up by 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, 1/6, etc., each year’s gain is still $10,000 but the eventual percentage is only 1%.

No stock follows that trend. They don’t always go up, and their yearly percentages don’t follow such mathematical precision.

Other trends are more likely. Most companies eventually fail or get absorbed, so it pays to watch for the time to sell. Companies can also succeed, and they may see low but steady and even boring growth for many years or decades. Then, despite small percentages, the frugal investor can see yearly increases that exceed their yearly expenses, which can build a portfolio upon itself in an effective compound interest (which can then be turned to marvelous philanthropy). It can look unreal in anticipation, but it can appear so simple in reflection. Here’s to eventually looking back on what started with the movement of a few cents.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Heard and Said

The world edits a non-fiction writer’s choice of topics. I’d planned to write a rather dull arithmetic post that would answer some frequently asked questions about penny stocks and interest. Well, the world was more interested in delivering an excellent example of the hearsay I described on Wednesday. Microvision hit the news, well not the news, more like the buzz or the rumor circuit, and became swept up in the feverish chase after The Next Big Thing. Or maybe not.

For those new to the scene, Microvision (MVIS) is a small speculative company that finally launched a product. It is a pocket projector called the ShowWX, designed by people who wear pocket protectors who may be as bad at marketing as most engineers. The device is the size of an iPhone, but under the right lighting conditions, i.e. dark, the projector can create as large of an image as you want that is always in focus. The resolution is about the same as a DVD player which is why I am able to use mine to watch Netflix after the sun goes down. It doesn’t require bat-cave darkness, but the darker the room, the bigger the usable image can be. It uses lasers, similar to laser-pointers, so each dot can be bright and travel a long distance before diffusing. Some folks have replaced their big, noisy, home theater projectors with this little portable device because it is quiet.

Sounds great? Then why is the stock down below $2? It must be an excellent buy. Well, wait a bit. They use lasers, which is good for many reason, but if you notice, red lasers are very common. Blue lasers have just become common which is why blu-ray players are suddenly available. But green lasers, where are the green lasers? They need red, blue and green to make a color image. Despite Microvision designing equipment based on them, green lasers small enough for portable projectors have only been invented within the last few years. Early technology is expensive so the units Microvision sold early this year may have had a negative profit margin. Negative, as in losing money on every sale. Couple that with dodgy early technology (Mine’s an early unit and below average, so I have trouble reading subtitles. Rats.) and sales aren’t stellar, so revenues aren’t great, profits don’t exist, and the company has to sell bits of itself to stay alive. The company’s value gets hammered down.

Technology changes quickly though and they’ve actually reduced the size and such down to the point that the pocket projector, called a pico-projector (a term coined by Microvision), can fit into almost any device. Candidate number one is a cell phone. So, imagine carrying around a 100 inch projection monitor in your pocket or purse. If it fits there, it can fit in more places than any of us can imagine. Are you reading this on a screen? (If not, what did you do? Print it out? Or have the machine read it to you?) The screen could be replaced with a projector the size of a chocolate mint. It would be lighter, cheaper, and more versatile than most every computer screen today. It may not be bright enough or high enough resolution now, but the technology is improving quickly enough that they’ve already demonstrated the cell phone version, an HD version, and just released a version with a 50% increase in brightness.

It is the classic race of a startup, product progress racing with cash. For over ten years Microvision has been losing that race. Technical hurdles have been crossed but there are production, marketing, and operational hurdles ahead. Green lasers were rare, will become common, and will eventually become cheap. But a tiny company may not survive such challenges. Imagine again, and a lot of imagining goes on, which is ironic considering that Microvision is an imaging company, but imagine that someone like Apple would commit to using Microvision’s product. With such friends, great things can happen.

On Friday morning there was a research note that suggested that Apple would possibly use Microvision’s projector in the next iPhone or iPad. Investors heard “possibly would use” and shortened it to ” would use” and the stock climbed from $1.40 to $2.10 within 2.5 hours. MVIS climbed 50% based on the collective ability to skip one word in a short report. It probably would have gone higher because such news would transform Microvision from a startup into the range of billion dollar market caps. But the bubble popped. Another researcher pointed out the cause of the speculation and the price descended. MVIS ended the day up $0.13, about 9%. Millions of dollars were involved. Some firm probably made a million, in which case another firm may have lost a million. Individual investors like myself don’t get to see the personal implications, so I don’t know.

I’m glad to say that I wasn’t caught up by the mis-understanding. I’ve heard similar rumors for years, some with better substantiation. Honda, Nokia, DoD, Canon, BMW, have all been mentioned. Someday it will probably be true. Progress is being made. But I knew that before the mis-interpreted report.

Despite being based on misunderstanding, such hearsay has a value. What I learned was that this little sub-$2 stock represents a company that potentially has a great demand. The risks are high enough to keep the big money away, but the rewards are great enough to draw about eight times the normal trading traffic because of a rumor. That is a substantial underpinning. The major investors are ruthless and won’t save the company for the sake of a more eco-friendly product (a pico-projector uses far fewer resources than a big screen monitor), but they will be the energy that drives the stock up, which aids the company’s financing, which makes the financing easier, which constructively reinforces the company’s success.

Maybe Apple will be the first major company to incorporate Microvision’s components into their products. Apple patents frequently refer to Microvision’s technology. Intel has already expressed interest in a game controller. Some firm was almost ready to launch a high-end media player for Christmas, but postponed the launch into 2011. If any of those succeed soon, then Microvision, and probably MVIS, succeeds too.

That’s why I continue to hold the stock, despite over a decade of waiting. If, if, they succeed, they can disrupt the electronics industry in many positive ways. Fewer resources dug or burned. Less waste heading to the landfill. Less energy spent shipping around big mostly empty boxes packed with Styrofoam and plastic.

They have significant hurdles to cross. I want folks to be aware of that. The technology is disruptive and the stock is seductive. My purpose in this post isn’t to sell the company or the stock, but to show how selective we, and even the titans of finance can be when faced with such potential and delivered with such a message. It is easy to hear what we want to hear, in stocks and in life.

And if you’ve ever wondered why I say that my favorite spectator sport is the stock market, imagine the dramas I got to watch and witness as the stock climbed. You see, the rumor may have been right.

Stay tuned.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Hear and Say

“Hear and say” sounds like the kids’ toy “Speak and Spell“, but the kids get a better chance of learning something. The adults are more likely to merely parrot an increasingly inaccurate message. The problem is that “hear and say” is the basis of communal communication, and we all know that it eventually spawns hearsay. Sometimes we have to rely on heard inaccuracies because they are the best news source. “She likes you! She really does!” As if any of us know our true emotions. Sometimes we must filter heavily and categorize the news as rumor, or even fiction. The trick is knowing what to believe and use.

I doubt that anyone is unscathed from, nor totally innocent of, unpleasant miscommunications. Anyone living in a small town knows that life is a fish bowl of a swirl of local “news” of who was seen with whom, which might have little to do with anything more than coincidence. People care. People notice, and they make their best guess at the stories without checking for facts, because the facts would be too hard to uncover. Besides, dig too deep into someone’s life and they may dig back into yours.

The investment world should be clearer and cleaner. Publicly traded companies are required to release financial every quarter. They are also required to make global public announcements of information whenever it significantly affects the company’s operations. The CEO has cancer? That’s news. They changed the color of the building? Probably not. The system is designed to give everyone the opportunity to get the same news at the same time. It is called “leveling the playing field”, but everyone knows that the playing field has potholes and that sometimes the wind blows the ball one way or that the sun will be in the eyes of those at the other end of the field.

There is too much money and power involved for people to patiently wait for press releases. The more money that’s involved, the more likely that researchers, analysts, and investors will be sorting through every scrap of data and information that can be collected from sources outside the company. If enough greed is involved, the search may go inside; which is an unfair advantage, which is one reason insider trading is illegal.

Inevitably, the early information is incomplete and intelligent extrapolations, i.e. guessing, must be made to complete the picture. Supposedly the professional money managers are better at that than the crowd of individual investors, but I have yet to see data to prove that. We’ve seen so many financial implosions lately that the dust hasn’t cleared enough for us to really see the scope of the craters. Many of us were covered by dust. Too many were hit by shrapnel. There were even individuals that shared in the implosions because they mimicked the wrong professionals.

Many of the professionals heard tidbits about new financial strategies and followed them without digging into the details like assumptions and restrictions. The story sounded good so they drove on assuming the rest of the story was as good as the first tidbit. It sounds silly, and the results were catastrophic, but it is a very human tendency.

It is hard to find the time to totally understand a company. Management rarely knows everything, and they supposedly have the best access and the best data. Uncertainty is inevitable. But that’s a poor reason to fill in the blanks with a rumor. That’s why I use more than one.

I handle the uncertainties by considering scenarios. I pay attention to rumors, but I don’t expect any of them to be accurate. With each rumor though I consider the possible scenario in terms of how it would play out for the company and the stock. At a minimum that means I always have at least two scenarios to consider. One is the simplest, based only on the company’s possibly sporadic news. The other is based on the rumor. And there is always more than one rumor. After a few rumors have drifted by it becomes possible to get a feel for the scope of possibilities. What’s the worst? What’s the best? Are the most likely ones clustered around a similar story? Or is everything scattered?

Microvision (MVIS) has a potentially disruptive display technology. Their device is cheap, small, light, scalable, and uses very little power. The terrible scenarios include being too disruptive to be accepted, or too hard to made profitably, or maybe the competition is too fierce. The great scenarios include having a reach as pervasive as Intel because Intel’s chips move electrons and Microvision’s chips move photons. Even the average of the two extremes would make for a profitable company and investment, but most scenarios cluster at the extremes. There are very few in the middle, even though the middle ground would still embody a profitable company.

Dendreon (DNDN) has a disruptive technology in the form of cancer vaccines that challenge the traditional chemo and radiation treatments. Dendreon’s technology is FDA approved and the data suggests that it has minimal side effects. Data also suggests that, even at $93,000 per treatment, Dendreon’s approach is cheaper than the traditional treatments. The downside scenarios are minimal, and usually involve speculations about unexpected and previously unobserved side effects. The upside scenarios involve treating patients earlier, treating other cancers besides prostate, and expanding into other regions like Europe and Asia. The scenarios suggest a bright future, partly backed by data, and partly backed by the wealth of numerous positive possibilities. They won’t all come true, but any one is enough.

MVIS is trading at under $2. DNDN is trading at over $36. Granted that Dendreon got a headstart on their technology (Microvision is waiting on better green lasers) but some of their five year revenue projections are similar. Or at least were. Two years ago both companies were both trading under $5.

Prior to that, their stories were nothing but hearsay. Yet I invested anyway. So far, one has worked well. One has not. The playing field isn’t level. The researchers and analysts seem to have good info on Microvision’s supply problems. But they seemed to have dismissed Dendreon’s potential, possibly because they listened to rumors based on the side effects familiar to old technologies. They are fallible.

That’s why I am not deterred from investing. I may not have access to the best data, and may have to listen to rumors and speculations, but just like in a small town, it pays to know what to listen to, and to know to throw out most of the rest. The financial powerhouses have the resources, but I have advantages too. I know that trusting my judgement, experience, and skills can direct me to overlooked investments. Knowledge of my goals helps me sort out scenarios that can feed my life. By making it personal I make it internal, where there is very little hearsay.

PS

As I post this, DNDN is up by more than the total value of a share of MVIS (DNDN up $1.66 > MVIS trading at $1.38). Maybe someday I’ll post about how that numbers game plays out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment