Here I sit, comfortable in my tiny house, home after attending Housing Solutions Network‘s presentation of ‘affordable housing’ in Port Townsend. It reminds me of how good my situation is. It reminds me of how much good, useful work is being done. It also reminds me of how many still have nothing. And sadly, it also reminds me of how many people have other things to worry about, or at least to be distracted by.
Housing Solutions Network does good work, yet they have little headline news. They help people. They help projects. Others get most of the credit, which is appropriate because within each of those projects is a cadre of workers dedicated to their solution. Applause all around.
I don’t have any project. The main reason I was there was to take some notes for someone who couldn’t attend, the co-host of the podcast I help with, B. Alice of Traffic Jam At The Intersection Of Health And Housing. Besides, I’m more interested in attending the event than reading about it in the paper. (And yes, I still get a paper copy of the paper.)
The bad news is that there is a lot of work to do. The good news is that a lot has been done, is being done, and is planned to be done. The room had, I guess, about 70-80 people in there. Many of them were associated with various projects. I’m guessing some are funders. There were only two people there who were self-identified as ‘housing distressed’.
My main excuse was to pass along insights to B. Alice. My main interest was to see how many homeless attended.
Those two were the closest. I wasn’t surprised. 1) It cost $30 for a ticket. I’m sure there were scholarships and allowances, but when I was in my poorest situation I didn’t have the money, naturally; nor the time. I was working 7 days per week and frequently 12 hours a day. Go to a meeting? Ha! 2) Such meetings seem to be more for keeping the wheels turning in terms of fundraising and advocacy. Sadly, this also means that ‘the homeless’ become a statistic by necessity. How else to address such a large population of underserved people?
And yet, that’s one thing B. Alice has started providing. The podcast is an opportunity to give homeless individuals individual voices. In some ways, people who are homeless are one of the most diverse groups I know. Everyone has a story about how they got there, and no one has the same story. That’s true of humanity, though a middle-class life tends towards common conventions. Give them a voice because they don’t have the time or resources to do it themselves.
I applauded as appropriate. I cheer on the folks in the room who sincerely want to help. I’ve also been writing and advocating for basically housing for all for about twenty years. (My pet peeve is the term ‘affordable housing’. Every house has been affordable to someone. I’m more a fan of ‘housing for all’, but I’m working on the wording around it.)
They talked about balancing interests. Right. They’re right. But I must admit to learning from Maslow’s Pyramid of Need. Humans need housing. Needs are the bottom tier of the pyramid. Maintaining neighborhood character or market conditions are wants, not needs. Needs should out-prioritize wants. That’s true in our personal lives. That should be true in our community.
Note that I’m not saying that people can’t have grand houses. If you have the wealth, legally you can have those things. But I’d be prouder of a society that provided, prioritized everyone’s needs before addressing wealthier wants.
And yet, homeless people who have solutions to their needs can’t get a permit to meet those needs. They are not permitted to live. Yet, they do, usually by working along the edges of a society that shoved them there. Cheers for resourcefulness. Anguish over their need to have to struggle so.
Whew. My apologies. I got on a bit of a rant there.
And I guess suppressing rants is one way debates get to continue. And they can take so much time. Apologies to the people living in the forest in the meantime. Patience while waiting for the next meeting is easy when the heat is on, the roof, walls, and floor are firm.
One of my more concise notes from the evening was, ‘I’ve heard all of this before.’ Six people housed here. Maybe a dozen there. Occasionally a 120 unit success. And usually it is for people who can be described as some percentage of the local median income. I’ve seen very few meetings that strive to solve anything for the 0th percentile. I wish I had an answer. When the number is zero, even a lottery ticket is too expensive.
As the man said, it is a balancing act. Currently, it is easy to find communities where the majority are having to spend on housing, and health care, and food, and the bureaucratic necessities like taxes and insurance. We haven’t solved that, either. In the meantime, good meetings like this are held to make what progress we can with what we have. Applause, again.
B. Alice and I meet at a local cidery that has an open-air meeting space. It is easy for us to talk about homeless situations. The odd part is to do so in the midst of a hubbub of people who are enjoying a bit of country luxury. For me, it is a reminder of the larger balancing act. I see folks who probably have a house, and have to tend it. The family takes time. Work, of course. Retirees may be slowly recuperating from decades of a job that never became a career. It is easy to think in terms of ‘if all these people would spend a few hours helping, or donating the cost of a drink, or at least listening so much can get done.’ And the same thing can be said about cleaning the beaches, or fixing literal fences, or tutoring, or sitting with a lonely sick person, or simply listening.
We’re all in a myriad of balancing acts. Thanks to those who work on any of it. I’m particularly thankful to those who start by working on supplying those basic needs. Thank you.






